<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PCI DSS 11.3: Penetration Testing Requirements Clarified</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcidssguru.com/pci-dss/pci-dss-113-penetration-testing-requirements-clarified/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcidssguru.com/pci-dss/pci-dss-113-penetration-testing-requirements-clarified/</link>
	<description>Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:56:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohamed Farid</title>
		<link>http://www.pcidssguru.com/pci-dss/pci-dss-113-penetration-testing-requirements-clarified/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohamed Farid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 17:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcidssguru.com/?p=4#comment-328</guid>
		<description>Regarding the external pen test - the pen tester will evaluate the Scope from the Internet or through any Public Connection ...

What about the Internal Pen Testing - Will it be evaluated from the DMZ towards the Scope ( Live Production ) ? or internally from the Scope Directly ?

My Concern is Evaluating it from inside is ignoring the Firewalls and the Access-lists around the scope - and also it will give a lot of false positives which are already protected using the boundary security products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the external pen test &#8211; the pen tester will evaluate the Scope from the Internet or through any Public Connection &#8230;</p>
<p>What about the Internal Pen Testing &#8211; Will it be evaluated from the DMZ towards the Scope ( Live Production ) ? or internally from the Scope Directly ?</p>
<p>My Concern is Evaluating it from inside is ignoring the Firewalls and the Access-lists around the scope &#8211; and also it will give a lot of false positives which are already protected using the boundary security products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penetration Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.pcidssguru.com/pci-dss/pci-dss-113-penetration-testing-requirements-clarified/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Penetration Testing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcidssguru.com/?p=4#comment-13</guid>
		<description>What are your thoughts on situations where Operational Security and other areas of Information Security have separate reporting lines - i.e. they may have separate line management but report into the same CSO or head of security? Would it still be feasible to have non-ops infosec conducting penetration testing in your opinion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your thoughts on situations where Operational Security and other areas of Information Security have separate reporting lines &#8211; i.e. they may have separate line management but report into the same CSO or head of security? Would it still be feasible to have non-ops infosec conducting penetration testing in your opinion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
